<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drive, Curiosity, Ethics, Collaboration and Competence Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pontydysgu.org/2007/11/drive-curiosity-ethics-collaboration-and-competence-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2007/11/drive-curiosity-ethics-collaboration-and-competence-development/</link>
	<description>Pontydysgu - Educational Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2007/11/drive-curiosity-ethics-collaboration-and-competence-development/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pontydysgu.org/2007/11/drive-curiosity-ethics-collaboration-and-competence-development/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Graham, one reason why we don&#039;t assess these dimensions is that in an &quot;objective&quot; way we do not know how to.  Is there progression? What does a beginning collaborator look like, how do we discriminate them from an intermediate collaborator and in what ways does a weak intermediate collaborator differ from a beginning collaborator. Is there development? What is a good kindergarten collaborator? What is a good post grad collaborator?

It may be this is the wrong language. However if this is the wrong language why? What will be more appropriate?

Oddly I think I know who is curious, who is a good collaborator, who is ethical...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham, one reason why we don&#8217;t assess these dimensions is that in an &#8220;objective&#8221; way we do not know how to.  Is there progression? What does a beginning collaborator look like, how do we discriminate them from an intermediate collaborator and in what ways does a weak intermediate collaborator differ from a beginning collaborator. Is there development? What is a good kindergarten collaborator? What is a good post grad collaborator?</p>
<p>It may be this is the wrong language. However if this is the wrong language why? What will be more appropriate?</p>
<p>Oddly I think I know who is curious, who is a good collaborator, who is ethical&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

