<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The evidence against Facebook piles up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/01/the-evidence-against-facebook-piles-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/01/the-evidence-against-facebook-piles-up/</link>
	<description>Pontydysgu.org</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/01/the-evidence-against-facebook-piles-up/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/01/the-evidence-against-facebook-piles-up/#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>Alas, facebook is a private company, and as such is free to do as it pleases within the law. I'm sure the fine print of the terms and conditions sets this out. I would expect these to include that they can throw people off the site for any reason they like, barring any race, gender etc. factors which would be prohibited by law. If you don't like it, start an open/wiki/p2p social networking tool and make your own rules. If you do it before anyone else, you might even turn a (small, ethical) buck on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, facebook is a private company, and as such is free to do as it pleases within the law. I&#8217;m sure the fine print of the terms and conditions sets this out. I would expect these to include that they can throw people off the site for any reason they like, barring any race, gender etc. factors which would be prohibited by law. If you don&#8217;t like it, start an open/wiki/p2p social networking tool and make your own rules. If you do it before anyone else, you might even turn a (small, ethical) buck on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/01/the-evidence-against-facebook-piles-up/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/01/the-evidence-against-facebook-piles-up/#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>"I am not sure we should encourage people to join Facebook. It may be time to campaign and organise against the platform owners."

It has begun comrade.

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7607272187</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am not sure we should encourage people to join Facebook. It may be time to campaign and organise against the platform owners.&#8221;</p>
<p>It has begun comrade.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7607272187" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7607272187</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook &#187; The evidence against Facebook piles up</title>
		<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/01/the-evidence-against-facebook-piles-up/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook &#187; The evidence against Facebook piles up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pontydysgu.org/2008/01/the-evidence-against-facebook-piles-up/#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>[...] Graham Attwell wrote an interesting post today on The evidence against Facebook piles upHere&#8217;s a quick excerptI am in York at a meeting of the Jisc Emerge programme. There seems to be increasing disillusionment with Facebook. And the evidence against Facebook is mounting.This is from the latest edition of the LabourStart newsletter. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Graham Attwell wrote an interesting post today on The evidence against Facebook piles upHere&#8217;s a quick excerptI am in York at a meeting of the Jisc Emerge programme. There seems to be increasing disillusionment with Facebook. And the evidence against Facebook is mounting.This is from the latest edition of the LabourStart newsletter. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
