<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research in Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pontydysgu.org/2009/02/research-in-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2009/02/research-in-practice/</link>
	<description>Pontydysgu - Educational Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristina Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2009/02/research-in-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-15036</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristina Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pontydysgu.org/?p=1224#comment-15036</guid>
		<description>I have another take what you are saying there... and it might be this is not the right interpretation, but I think these are great tools to help one in his/her research, without them ( the social software tools) being necessarily the focus of the research. 
We have come a long way when it comes to use social software, and researching about it, but we still haven&#039;t been able to innovate in the ways we carry out that research and especially how we present it. We still go back to the old technology: printed press. 
And now I will be focusing more on my reality as a PhD student.
I am thinking it would be cool to be able to present my dissertation in a different way  rather than the usual &#039;stack of paper&#039; we need to present the jury with. Why can&#039;t I make a movie instead? Why can&#039;t the researchers&#039; field notes be a blog, and such evidence be presented as such, instead of having to transcribe it then later to a word document? Why can&#039;t a doctoral research also be an interdisciplinary, collaborative project where people from different disciplines could look at the same phenomenon through the lens of the area they belong to? 
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have another take what you are saying there&#8230; and it might be this is not the right interpretation, but I think these are great tools to help one in his/her research, without them ( the social software tools) being necessarily the focus of the research.<br />
We have come a long way when it comes to use social software, and researching about it, but we still haven&#8217;t been able to innovate in the ways we carry out that research and especially how we present it. We still go back to the old technology: printed press.<br />
And now I will be focusing more on my reality as a PhD student.<br />
I am thinking it would be cool to be able to present my dissertation in a different way  rather than the usual &#8216;stack of paper&#8217; we need to present the jury with. Why can&#8217;t I make a movie instead? Why can&#8217;t the researchers&#8217; field notes be a blog, and such evidence be presented as such, instead of having to transcribe it then later to a word document? Why can&#8217;t a doctoral research also be an interdisciplinary, collaborative project where people from different disciplines could look at the same phenomenon through the lens of the area they belong to?<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frances Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.pontydysgu.org/2009/02/research-in-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-15026</link>
		<dc:creator>Frances Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pontydysgu.org/?p=1224#comment-15026</guid>
		<description>Graham,
There may be an explanation for this.  Many people I know use Skype, etc. as everyday desktop tools.  5 or 10 years ago, a video-conferencing system would have merited attention in a project proposal/ report on account of the resource needed to fund it.  Now that need does not arise as the tools are &#039;free&#039;.  Some projects will mention tools that still need funding e.g. JISc Emerge and Elluminate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham,<br />
There may be an explanation for this.  Many people I know use Skype, etc. as everyday desktop tools.  5 or 10 years ago, a video-conferencing system would have merited attention in a project proposal/ report on account of the resource needed to fund it.  Now that need does not arise as the tools are &#8216;free&#8217;.  Some projects will mention tools that still need funding e.g. JISc Emerge and Elluminate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

