GoogleTranslate Service


Developing a Pedagogical Framework for Web 2.0 and social software

February 17th, 2010 by Graham Attwell

Earlier this week, I wrote a post on issues in transitions between school and work, school and university and university and work. This is part of Pontydysgu’s ongoing work on the recently launched (no web site yet) G8WAY project. the project seeks to use social software to help learners in transitions. We are working at the moment on developing a Pedagogical Framework.

This is not so easy. I used to rail against the idea that educational technology is pedagogically neutral as so many vendors used to say. All technology has affordances which can facilitate or impair different pedagogical approaches. And whilst the educational technology community has tended to espouse constructivist approaches to learning, the reality is that most Virtual Learning Environments have tended to be a barrier to such an approach to learning.

However Web 2.0 and social software opens up many new possible approaches to learning, largely due to the ability for learners to actively create and through collaboration and social networking. But teachers constantly ask what software they should use and how they can use it in the classroom. What software is good for what pedagogic approach, they ask?

The idea of the G8WAY framework is enables us to map onto digital media and e-tools with regard to their learning characteristics, such as thinking and reflection, conversation and interaction, experience and activity or evidence and demonstration. This can then be used as the basis against which to benchmark pedagogical principles for any particular learning scenario developed within G8WAY.

So, for example, a learning activity that enables learners to reflect on their experience, say for example, in a work-based learning context – would map to ‘thinking and reflection’ and ‘evidence and demonstration’. In contrast, a learning activity that supported collaboration would map to the first three characteristics. Of course any one individual using this schema would map particular instances differently, depending on their interpretation of the framework and the context of use of the tools; the point is this framework provides a useful schema to think about tools in use and how they map to different characteristics of learning.

This seems a useful approach – the question is how to do it? Does anyone have any references to previous approaches like this?

6 Responses to “Developing a Pedagogical Framework for Web 2.0 and social software”

  1. Hi Graham,

    what you are describing here seems to be pretty close to the ideas we follow with the learners´garden project (http://www.learnersgarden.de) . Although our framework is designed to grow with the community. Because we believe that such a system only can help if its close to the demands of the learners. We are pretty much at the beginning of the project, in the near fututre we plan to come up with the english speaking version of the platform. Our problem is, that we don´t have any funding. Maybe you have some ideas how we could come together?
    Greetings from Berlin
    Wolfgang

  2. Helen Keegan says:

    Hi Graham – sounds like an interesting project!

    It’s definitely worth you reading/referring to Gráinne Conole’s “New Schemas for Mapping Pedagogies and Technologies” http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue56/conole/

  3. Sigi Jakob says:

    Hi Graham,
    you are naming the essence of learning processes and how they could possibly be triggered and supported by social software. We need to consider that at this specific period we cannot act as if there was no school or whatever authority . Most often educational decisions are being made by people not actively involved in teaching. As an example you can see the ban of mobile devices from all schools in a district in Switzerland – even though the use of mobiles for learning is being promoted in teacher colleges in the same district.
    What I personallly think could help bridge this gap is using a software that offers all the possibilities and requirements you are naming, from individual learning to collaborative working and giving evidence of learning. I have been using moodle for some years now, opening it up to the web and letting in the world- so students can use other social software wherever they want. The moodle classroom is our common communication and working space, whereas we use Mahara for the student’s learning diaries and all other personal learning. I think I can say that the two systems complement each other and can be open or closed whatever is appropriate for the specific situation. It is extremely difficult in (most) schools to get teachers change their teaching and students change their learning ( which is easier to achieve though …) and have them make use of social media. You are very often considered an alien and from admins to parents there is obstruction as the cause is not supported by authorities or required as teacher skills. So what can we do? We will need to start with the fenced garden to get acceptance but give them support to create new ways of learning in this garden and get them grow their veggies by themselves, finding out when to water them and when to give them fertilizer….and provide them with the right tools to do so.Educational Programs that aim high are always good but in the end will only succeed if there is a scaled access to the implementation. (MOSEP) What do you think? (You see, I’m getting wiser and more patient after all!)
    Sigi

Tweetbacks

  1. Developing a Pedagogical Framework for Web 2.0 and social software http://tinyurl.com/y9zsddj

Tweetbacks/Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] Pontydysgu – Bridge to Learning – Educational Research […]

  2. […] March 5, 2010 by Mark Pearson People often use the word “energy” to mean entirely different things in different contexts. It may mean oil when used in the context of transportation, it may mean electricity when used in the context of buildings, it may mean nuclear when used in the context of ‘green’. And for “energy” we can read “web 2 point oh”.  With this in mind, let’s look at this intriguing post from Graham Attwell’s Pontydysgu (pronunciation guide for non-Welsh speakers — Pont – uh – duz – gee — at least that’s how I think it’s pronounced from my limited Welsh experience) entitled “Developing a Pedagogical Framework for Web 2.0 and social software“. […]

  • Search Pontydysgu.org

    Social Media




    News Bites

    Gap between rich and poor university students widest for 12 years

    Via The Canary.

    The gap between poor students and their more affluent peers attending university has widened to its largest point for 12 years, according to data published by the Department for Education (DfE).

    Better-off pupils are significantly more likely to go to university than their more disadvantaged peers. And the gap between the two groups – 18.8 percentage points – is the widest it’s been since 2006/07.

    The latest statistics show that 26.3% of pupils eligible for FSMs went on to university in 2018/19, compared with 45.1% of those who did not receive free meals. Only 12.7% of white British males who were eligible for FSMs went to university by the age of 19. The progression rate has fallen slightly for the first time since 2011/12, according to the DfE analysis.


    Quality Training

    From Raconteur. A recent report by global learning consultancy Kineo examined the learning intentions of 8,000 employees across 13 different industries. It found a huge gap between the quality of training offered and the needs of employees. Of those surveyed, 85 per cent said they , with only 16 per cent of employees finding the learning programmes offered by their employers effective.


    News from 1994

    This is from a Tweet. In 1994 Stephen Heppell wrote in something called SCET” “Teachers are fundamental to this. They are professionals of considerable calibre. They are skilled at observing their students’ capability and progressing it. They are creative and imaginative but the curriculum must give them space and opportunity to explore the new potential for learning that technology offers.” Nothing changes!


    Graduate Jobs

    As reported by WONKHE, a survey of 1,200 final year students conducted by Prospects in the UK found that 29 per cent have lost their jobs, and 26 per cent have lost internships, while 28 per cent have had their graduate job offer deferred or rescinded. 47 per cent of finalists are considering postgraduate study, and 29 per cent are considering making a career change. Not surprisingly, the majority feel negative about their future careers, with 83 per cent reporting a loss of motivation and 82 per cent saying they feel disconnected from employers


    Other Pontydysgu Spaces

    • Pontydysgu on the Web

      pbwiki
      Our Wikispace for teaching and learning
      Sounds of the Bazaar Radio LIVE
      Join our Sounds of the Bazaar Facebook goup. Just click on the logo above.

      We will be at Online Educa Berlin 2015. See the info above. The stream URL to play in your application is Stream URL or go to our new stream webpage here SoB Stream Page.

  • Twitter

  • @C_Goodfellow_ Congratulations. And enjoy your big day. X

    About 2 hours ago from Cristina Costa's Twitter via Twitter for Android

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Meta

  • Categories