GoogleTranslate Service


Foucault and the proposed Code of Conduct for Teachers

December 31st, 2008 by Graham Attwell

Last week I wrote an article about the controversial General Teaching Council of England proposed code of Conduct for teachers. Commentators had protested at what they saw as intrusion into the personal lives of teachers. Furthermore, there was a concern as to who was saying what was and what was not acceptable behaviour and how such a code might be used to suppress ideas seen by authorities as undesirable.

Recent events in London show the dangers. As reported in the Guardian newspaper a  Special Needs teachers, Adrian Swain, was dismissed a week before Christmas from St Paul’s Way, a comprehensive in Tower Hamlets, east London for refusing to stop wearing clothes which failed the school’s new dress code.

What were the offending clothes? Adrian Swain, who teaches Physical Education, came to work wearing track suit bottoms and trainers.

There is widespread suspicion that the real reason for sacking Adrian, is because he is secretary of the local teachers union, the National Union of Teachers.

The school justification for the enforcement of a dress code is that teachers should not wear anything that the students are not allowed to. And, for non UK readers of this blog, the UK persists in allowing schools to force students to wear school uniforms, even for very young children. When my stepdaughter was 7, I was summonsed to a meeting the her headteacher, who told me that she would no longer be allowed into school if she wore Doctor Martins shoes. The reason for the ban, said the head, was because wearing such shoes was hindering her learning!

As Foucault said prison is not unique. It is positioned within the disciplined society, the society of generalized surveillance in which we live. “What is so astonishing,” Foucault asked, “about the fact that our prisons resemble our factories, schools, military bases, and hospitals-all of which in turn resemble prisons?”

Commenting on the Swain case, Brian Lightman, former president of the Association of School and College Leaders, said many schools had dress codes for their teachers because staff were role models to their pupils. This begs the question of what sort of roles are being modelled, The sacking of Adrian Swain has no connection to his abilities as a teacher. It is all to do with reinforcing uniformity and maintaining the role of schools as an instrument of control. The proposed Code of Conduct for Teachers is designed for the same purposes. It should be stopped.

Please follow and like us:

3 Responses to “Foucault and the proposed Code of Conduct for Teachers”

  1. Ray Tolley says:

    One of the expectations of a teacher is that he/she IS a professional. Schools that have a strict uniform code are only reflecting a part of a much more thorough code of conduct for the whole of school life. Any teacher should understand that he/she is first and foremost a professional, and may be required to teach or supervise any class or group, attend any staff training session or attend to a visiting parent/govenor/dignitary at a moment’s notice.

    The teacher in question should therefore consider himself firstly as an upholder of school policy. However, if that policy has been badly communicated or not properly supported by senior staff there may be some cause for an errosion of standards. If the teacher in question was in the habit of turning up late and not able to attend to his normal responsibilities before changing into his PE kit, I would question his professionality. However, from the information to hand, we do not know if the teacher had previously recieved informal/formal/written warnings. From my previous experience of supporting staff in such cases, I would doubt that this is a ‘first instance’ – otherwise the school would be on seriously dodgy ground.

    But, on Dress Code in general, I fear that some schools do their pupils a disservice by not establishing a code that everyone can recognise and obey. How can a school claim that it is preparing young people for the Business World or the World of Work if they have not learnt to be comfortable in an appropriate business uniform? When my students went into Work Experience situations I expected them to be comfortable wearing a tie, a business suit and prepared to change into protective clothing appropriate to their working environment when they got there unless told otherwise. Conversely, I have also come across young men, having left school, who cannot tie their tie or fasten shoe-laces!

    I fear that far too often schools fail to realise that it is *their* responsibility to introduce youngsters to these concepts before they get rejected at the formal interview. And this applies equally, whether the school is to be found on the Isle of Skye, the Lleyn Peninsula or the Isle of Dogs.

  2. I suspect there is a middle ground which has something to do with appropriateness. Ray, you make a big leap from establishing a dress code that everyone can recognise and obey (with which I agree) to the imposition of a particular “business uniform” (with which I do not). I would be very happy if school taught students to conform to the dress code of the creative industries (a hugely important industry in Britain) or forestry or indeed domestic care as much as that of petty bureaucrats. We don’t all wear ties to work. For me a dress code in school serves several functions, not least trying to mitigate the impacts of a very costly fashion competition. Though heaven knows the art of subverting a school uniform has been an essential part of a teenagers tool kit since year dot. If the teacher in question’s “normal responsibilities” were teaching PE, why on earth should he wear a suit for the journey to and from school?

  3. jen hughes says:

    Well said Ray! My response was posted on another thread on the same subject somewhere else on this site – before I read yours

  • Search Pontydysgu.org

    Social Media




    News Bites

    Cyborg patented?

    Forbes reports that Microsoft has obtained a patent for a “conversational chatbot of a specific person” created from images, recordings, participation in social networks, emails, letters, etc., coupled with the possible generation of a 2D or 3D model of the person.

    Please follow and like us:


    Racial bias in algorithms

    From the UK Open Data Institute’s Week in Data newsletter

    This week, Twitter apologised for racial bias within its image-cropping algorithm. The feature is designed to automatically crop images to highlight focal points – including faces. But, Twitter users discovered that, in practice, white faces were focused on, and black faces were cropped out. And, Twitter isn’t the only platform struggling with its algorithm – YouTube has also announced plans to bring back higher levels of human moderation for removing content, after its AI-centred approach resulted in over-censorship, with videos being removed at far higher rates than with human moderators.

    Please follow and like us:


    Gap between rich and poor university students widest for 12 years

    Via The Canary.

    The gap between poor students and their more affluent peers attending university has widened to its largest point for 12 years, according to data published by the Department for Education (DfE).

    Better-off pupils are significantly more likely to go to university than their more disadvantaged peers. And the gap between the two groups – 18.8 percentage points – is the widest it’s been since 2006/07.

    The latest statistics show that 26.3% of pupils eligible for FSMs went on to university in 2018/19, compared with 45.1% of those who did not receive free meals. Only 12.7% of white British males who were eligible for FSMs went to university by the age of 19. The progression rate has fallen slightly for the first time since 2011/12, according to the DfE analysis.

    Please follow and like us:


    Quality Training

    From Raconteur. A recent report by global learning consultancy Kineo examined the learning intentions of 8,000 employees across 13 different industries. It found a huge gap between the quality of training offered and the needs of employees. Of those surveyed, 85 per cent said they , with only 16 per cent of employees finding the learning programmes offered by their employers effective.

    Please follow and like us:


    Other Pontydysgu Spaces

    • Pontydysgu on the Web

      pbwiki
      Our Wikispace for teaching and learning
      Sounds of the Bazaar Radio LIVE
      Join our Sounds of the Bazaar Facebook goup. Just click on the logo above.

      We will be at Online Educa Berlin 2015. See the info above. The stream URL to play in your application is Stream URL or go to our new stream webpage here SoB Stream Page.

      Please follow and like us:
  • Twitter

    RT @profneilmercer Gavin Williamson says that “traditional teacher-led lessons with children seated facing the expert at the front of the class” is “evidence-based” and “everyone flourishes”. Another big lie to put on the side of a bus? All the evidence supports dialogic teaching.

    Yesterday from Graham Attwell's Twitter via Twitter for Android

  • Our book (with @socialtheoryapp @rillera @CiaranBurkeSoc )'Social theory and the politics of higher education : critical perspectives on institutional research' can now be accessed via the Durham University Electronic Library library.dur.ac.uk/record=b325… cc @DUSofE

    Yesterday from Cristina Costa's Twitter via TweetDeck

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Meta

  • Categories