GoogleTranslate Service


Communities and Control

October 5th, 2009 by Graham Attwell

I don’t know how many of you read the Ecologist. But an article in the recent online edition about the demise of the Freecycle movement in the UK makes interesting reading. The Ecologist explains: “Freecycle is, in essence, a giant internet-based swap shop, made up of thousands of localised groups allowing users to give away stuff they don’t want any more, and receive stuff they do want.

The rules are simple: whatever you give away must be free, and you can’t keep taking without giving. The aim is to keep useful things out of landfill, and although there are no official figures as to how much waste the network has kept above ground in the last six years, with nearly 5,000 groups in over 70 countries, and a total membership tipping 6.5 million people, it’s hard to deny its success.”

But as they go on to report: “over the last month, simmering tensions in the network have boiled over, resulting in more than 40 per cent of the 510 UK Freecycle groups breaking away to form an independent network called Freegle.”

The issue appears to be over control, with US organisers keeping tight ownership of the Freecyle tradename and maintaining a close grip on how the network is organised and managed. This despite their dependence on local group organisers.

This is not the first dispute to split an internet based dispersed community, nor will it be the last. Communities, be they face to face or online, require facilitation and decision making processes. Yet just because the community is online does not change power relations. And when community members feel they no longer have access to decision making processes, or that decisions handed down are unjust, they will often challenge such leadership.

Such issues are particularly fraught for communities of practice and for networks established to support projects. Whilst they may wish to promote community involvement and participation, often decision making rests on ownership (in the case of education networks often with the funding body).

Ultimately the only answer is to develop community governance models. But just as with business models, we are yet to catch up with changing patterns of participation and involvement enabled by Web 2.0. The old committees that we elected to run our community societies and clubs in the past may not be suited to the forms of participation and interaction engendered by Web 2.0 technologies.

Whilst there are programmes and projects looking at ideas of digital democracy, this work is still in its infancy. What does digital democracy mean? And how can it best be organised? How do online communities mediate power relations?

The new independent Freegle network appears to be growing fast. It will be interesting to see how they organise themselves.


Please follow and like us:

4 Responses to “Communities and Control”

  1. alyssa says:

    I like the concept of freecycleing ,

    I think if enough people hear about it it will catch on.

  2. The first time I had to face my own demons in this area was with a playschool group. Because I had 4 kids in 5 years, eventually I became the only mother in the group who was a founding member. The original group was into creating something for all children in the community. As it evolved, the members wanted to pay the teacher a fairer wage and increase the quality of craft materials and activities, etc. It took me a day to realize that I was the only person who had joined who wasn’t giving their kids the best of everything so the affordability issue was a very self-centered one.

    Churches face the same issues. Most of the programming appeals to elderly seniors who are preserving their history. Do you serve the needs of your faithful supporters or do you focus your resources into creative programming that may or may not serve the needs of the 21st century broader community with their multitude of Sunday morning choices?

Tweetbacks

  1. An academic view on the #Freegle split from #Freecycle – http://bit.ly/pZ3rE – raises the issue of governance – will Freegle be different?

Tweetbacks/Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Graham Attwell, theo kuechel and Ali Brown. Ali Brown said: RT @GrahamAttwell: learning from the Freecycle dispute for developing communities practice & community governance – http://is.gd/3YTFs […]

  • Search Pontydysgu.org

    Social Media




    News Bites

    Cyborg patented?

    Forbes reports that Microsoft has obtained a patent for a “conversational chatbot of a specific person” created from images, recordings, participation in social networks, emails, letters, etc., coupled with the possible generation of a 2D or 3D model of the person.

    Please follow and like us:


    Racial bias in algorithms

    From the UK Open Data Institute’s Week in Data newsletter

    This week, Twitter apologised for racial bias within its image-cropping algorithm. The feature is designed to automatically crop images to highlight focal points – including faces. But, Twitter users discovered that, in practice, white faces were focused on, and black faces were cropped out. And, Twitter isn’t the only platform struggling with its algorithm – YouTube has also announced plans to bring back higher levels of human moderation for removing content, after its AI-centred approach resulted in over-censorship, with videos being removed at far higher rates than with human moderators.

    Please follow and like us:


    Gap between rich and poor university students widest for 12 years

    Via The Canary.

    The gap between poor students and their more affluent peers attending university has widened to its largest point for 12 years, according to data published by the Department for Education (DfE).

    Better-off pupils are significantly more likely to go to university than their more disadvantaged peers. And the gap between the two groups – 18.8 percentage points – is the widest it’s been since 2006/07.

    The latest statistics show that 26.3% of pupils eligible for FSMs went on to university in 2018/19, compared with 45.1% of those who did not receive free meals. Only 12.7% of white British males who were eligible for FSMs went to university by the age of 19. The progression rate has fallen slightly for the first time since 2011/12, according to the DfE analysis.

    Please follow and like us:


    Quality Training

    From Raconteur. A recent report by global learning consultancy Kineo examined the learning intentions of 8,000 employees across 13 different industries. It found a huge gap between the quality of training offered and the needs of employees. Of those surveyed, 85 per cent said they , with only 16 per cent of employees finding the learning programmes offered by their employers effective.

    Please follow and like us:


    Other Pontydysgu Spaces

    • Pontydysgu on the Web

      pbwiki
      Our Wikispace for teaching and learning
      Sounds of the Bazaar Radio LIVE
      Join our Sounds of the Bazaar Facebook goup. Just click on the logo above.

      We will be at Online Educa Berlin 2015. See the info above. The stream URL to play in your application is Stream URL or go to our new stream webpage here SoB Stream Page.

      Please follow and like us:
  • Twitter

    RT @profneilmercer Gavin Williamson says that “traditional teacher-led lessons with children seated facing the expert at the front of the class” is “evidence-based” and “everyone flourishes”. Another big lie to put on the side of a bus? All the evidence supports dialogic teaching.

    Yesterday from Graham Attwell's Twitter via Twitter for Android

  • Our book (with @socialtheoryapp @rillera @CiaranBurkeSoc )'Social theory and the politics of higher education : critical perspectives on institutional research' can now be accessed via the Durham University Electronic Library library.dur.ac.uk/record=b325… cc @DUSofE

    Yesterday from Cristina Costa's Twitter via TweetDeck

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Meta

  • Categories