GoogleTranslate Service


Three dimensions of a Personal Learning Environment

November 24th, 2010 by Graham Attwell

First a warning. This is the beginning of an idea but by no means fully tho0ught out.It comes from a discussion with Jenny Hughes last week, when we were talking about the future direction of work on Personal Learning Environments.

Jenny came up with three ‘dimensions’ of a PLE – intra-personal, inter-personal and extra personal which I presented at the #TICEDUCA2010 conference in Lisbon

The first – intra-personal – describes the spaces we use to work on our own. This includes the different software we use and the different physical spaces we work in. It is possibel that our intra personal spaces will look quite different – reflecting both our ways of thinking and our preferred ways of working. one interesting aspect of the intra personal learning environment is the importance of aesthetics – including the look and ‘feel’ of the environment. And whilst many of the3 developers I work with undertake usability standards, I do not think they really ever consider aesthetics.

The third dimension – extra personal – refers to the things we do out in the web – to our publications, to blogs like this, to the videos we post – to the things we share with others.

But perhaps the most interesting is dimension is the intra-personal learning environment. This is the shared spaces we use to collaborate and work with others. All too often such spaces are imposed – by teachers or by project coordinators or those responsible for web site development. And all too often they fail – because users have no ownership of those spaces. In other words the spaces are not seen or felt of as part of a PLE. How can this be overcome? Quite simply the inter-personal space needs to be negotiated – to develop spaces and ways of working that everyone can feel comfortable with. Of course this may mean compromises but it is through the process of negotiation that such compromises will emerge.

The problem may be that the PLE has come to be overly associated with personalisation rather than negotiation and ownership and too little attention has been paid to collaboration and social learning. I think it would also be interesting to look at how ideas and knowledge emerge – or as the Mature project would say – how Knowledge matures. In developing ideas and knowledge I suspect we use all three dimensions of our Personal Learning Environment – with new ideas emerging say from reading something in the extra PLE, moving ideas back to the intra PLE for thinking and working and developing and then sharing and working with others in the (negotiated) inter Personal Learning Environment. Of course in practice it will be more complex than this. But i would like to see how these processes work in the real world – although I suspect it would be a methodologically challenging piece of research to carry out. Anyone any ideas?

4 Responses to “Three dimensions of a Personal Learning Environment”

  1. I’m very interested about this reflection… excuse me if I’m thinking at the same time I write this.

    After some talks about this in Lisbon, I agree with the importance of make explicit this intra, extra and intra personal learning SPACES of working… it is definitively very interesting analyse the kind of negociation we do when we decide share an environment to work each other or even discuss each other… bases, personal meanings, foundations, and so on… would be very interesting, specially in the perspective of analysing collaborative learning, cooperative work and even work in groups to learn.

    Nonethe less, my impression is that these three perspectives -as you have describe- are including only perceptions about SPACES for working… for learning by working, making things (“artefacts”)… and definitively the space we use for working is an important part of our learning environment, BUT is only a third part of it. From my perspective (and the perspective we share with some colleagues), PLE is not only an space for working or doing “artefacts”… also for reflecting and reading (in the widest meaning of read)… and for these “experiences” (read) I’m not pretty sure that these three environments must be, at least, so clear.

    Even, because the PLE is more than the spaces we use to do things (technologies)… and for me, relationships and information on these “spaces” are even more crucial.
    Consequently, intra, extra and interPLEs, are interesting concepts to analyse the part of our PLE wich is developed for making things… and are focussing the interest of the analysis in the technological part PLEs, and is interesting… BUT, may be would be interesting also to thing about

    Intra: my reflections, toughts and meanings.
    Extra: Information, meanings and reflections FROM others.
    Inter: information, meanings and reflection build WITH others.

    Nevertheless, from this perspective, I’m not sure than the research about how we negociate these is so “new”… is the same than in any collaborative environment, with, or without technologies.

    Anycase, apologizes for the “english” I use and for being too daring with my oppinions some times ;-)… I’m only interested.

  2. While reading your post I’ve remembered a Steve Wheeler post, after his presentation, with Manish Malik, in PLE Conference- http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/2010/07/anatomy-of-ple.html – Anatomy of a PLE.
    I was wondering if your so-called “third dimension” isn’t the PLN part?
    After reading your post I felt like… confused… 🙂

  3. I was a little confused until I decided that ‘intra-personal’ (first line on para 5) must be ‘inter-personal’ – no?

    These seem like very useful lenses through which to view PLE/PLNs and I’m going to start trying to use them 🙂 However, I think we need to be careful thinking in this way not to conceive of these as clearly demarcated spaces with fixed and impermeable boundaries.

    Surely, what starts as intra-personal (tools & content) may become collaborative and inter-personal and maybe extra-personal. In a very basic example I may start a Google Doc for my personal ramblings and reflections on some experience and as I become more confident and believe these to be of use to others maybe I start sharing this with my closer collaborators and they offer suggestions and contribute to it and eventually perhaps we decide to make this public and publish – maybe using the same tools through out. Here the same tool and content dynamically moves through intra/inter/extra personal learning spaces. I guess you were probably thinking of these as dynamic spaces anyway.

    So, in accord with your 5th paragraph the implications for inter-personal spaces are that I won’t control over the tools and content that I move in and out of this space BUT of course as this space is not my space but our space some kind of negotiation is required – unless perhaps we can (at least for tools) use different tools to operate on the same shared content (e.g. you edit in whatever tool you prefer and in whatever I prefer with simultaneous live updating across these). We’d still need to negotiate the who the content was shared with though….

Tweetbacks

  1. Three dimensions of a Personal Learning Environment (via my6sense) http://tinyurl.com/2vopntt

  • Search Pontydysgu.org

    Social Media




    News Bites

    Graduate Jobs

    As reported by WONKHE, a survey of 1,200 final year students conducted by Prospects in the UK found that 29 per cent have lost their jobs, and 26 per cent have lost internships, while 28 per cent have had their graduate job offer deferred or rescinded. 47 per cent of finalists are considering postgraduate study, and 29 per cent are considering making a career change. Not surprisingly, the majority feel negative about their future careers, with 83 per cent reporting a loss of motivation and 82 per cent saying they feel disconnected from employers


    Post-Covid ed-tech strategy

    The UK Ufi VocTech Trust are supporting the Association of Colleges to ensure colleges are supported to collectively overcome challenges to delivering online provision at scale. Over the course of the next few months, AoC will carry out research into colleges’ current capacity to enable high quality distance learning. Findings from the research will be used to create a post-Covid ed-tech strategy for the college sector.

    With colleges closed for most face-to-face delivery and almost 100% of provision now being delivered online, the Ufi says, learners will require online content and services that are sustainable, collective and accessible. To ensure no one is disadvantaged or left behind due to the crisis, this important work will contribute to supporting businesses to transform and upskilling and reskilling those out of work or furloughed.


    Erasmus+

    The European Commission has published an annual report of the Erasmus+ programme in 2018. During that time the programme funded more than 23,500 projects and supported the mobility of over 850,00 students, of which 28,247 were involved in UK higher education projects, though only one third of these were UK students studying abroad while the remainder were EU students studying in the UK. The UK also sent 3,439 HE staff to teach or train abroad and received 4,970 staff from elsewhere in the EU.


    Skills Gaps

    A new report by the Learning and Work Institute for the Local Government Association (LGA) finds that by 2030 there could be a deficit of 2.5 million highly-skilled workers. The report, Local Skills Deficits and Spare Capacity, models potential skills gaps in eight English localities, and forecasts an oversupply of low- and intermediate -skilled workers by 2030. The LGA is calling on the government to devolve the various national skills, retraining and employment schemes to local areas. (via WONKHE)


    Other Pontydysgu Spaces

    • Pontydysgu on the Web

      pbwiki
      Our Wikispace for teaching and learning
      Sounds of the Bazaar Radio LIVE
      Join our Sounds of the Bazaar Facebook goup. Just click on the logo above.

      We will be at Online Educa Berlin 2015. See the info above. The stream URL to play in your application is Stream URL or go to our new stream webpage here SoB Stream Page.

  • Twitter

    RT @The_TUC #OnThisDay in 1970, the Equal Pay Act gave women the legal right to the same pay and conditions. Two years earlier, 187 women at the Dagenham Ford factory took a stand against unequal pay that paved the way for change. This is their story. pic.twitter.com/BXzVJxtI4z

    About 3 hours ago from Graham Attwell's Twitter via Twitter for Mac

  • RT @socialtheoryapp Just published: Taking education to account? The limits of law in institutional and professional practice tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1…

    Yesterday from Cristina Costa's Twitter via Twitter for Android

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Meta

  • Categories