GoogleTranslate Service


Evaluating e-Learning

November 26th, 2007 by Graham Attwell

We still have a substantial backlog of material to be published on this site. And we have a backlog of paper publications to go out. It will all sort out in time. But for the moment I am just trying to get things out in any way I can. So I have attached a PDF (1.1MB) version of a Guide to the Evaluation of e-Learning to this post.

This guide has been produced as a report on the work of the Models and Instruments for the evaluation of e-learning
and ICT supported learning (E-VAL) project. The project took place between 2002 and 2005 and was sponsored by the European Commission Leonardo da Vinci programme. The project was coordinated by Pontydysgu.

The following text is taken from the introduction to the guide.

The development of e-learning products and the provision of e-learning opportunities is one of the most rapidly expanding
areas of education and training.

Whether this is through an intranet, the internet, multimedia, interactive TV or computer based training, the growth of e-learning is accelerating. However, what is known about these innovative approaches to training has been limited by the shortage of scientifically credible evaluation. Is e-learning effective? In what contexts? For what groups of learners? How do different learners respond? Are there marked differences between different ICT platforms? Does the socio-cultural environment make a difference? Considering the costs of implementing ICT based training, is there a positive return on investment? What are the perceptions of VET professionals? What problems has it created for them?

E-learning is also one of the areas that attracts the most research and development funding. If this investment is to be maximised, it is imperative that we generate robust models for the evaluation of e-learning and tools which are flexible in use but consistent in results.

“Although recent attention has increased e-learning evaluation, the current research base for evaluating e-learning is inadequate … Due to the initial cost of implementing e-learning programs, it is important to conduct evaluation
studies.”
(American Society for Training and Development, 2001).

The Capitalisation report on the Leonardo da Vinci 1 programme, one of the biggest sponsors of innovative e-learning projects in European VET, also identified the lack of systematic evaluation as being the major weakness in e-learning projects.

However, whilst some have been desperately seeking answers to the question ‘What works and what doesn’t work?’ and looking for ways of improving the quality of e-learning, the response by a large sector of the community of e-learning developers and practitioners has been a growing preoccupation with software and platforms. There has been only limited
attention to pedagogy and learning. The development of models and tools for the evaluation of e-learning can help in improving the quality of e-learning and in informing and shaping future development in policy and practice.

The guide contains eleven sections:

  1. Introduction – why do we need new models and tools for the evaluation of e-learning
  2. Evaluating e-learning – what does the literature tell us?
  3. A Framework for the evaluation of e-learning
  4. Models and theories of evaluation
  5. Models and tools for the evaluation of e-learning – an overview
  6. The SPEAK Model and Tool
  7. Tool for the evaluation of the effectiveness of e-learning programmes in small- and medium sized
    enterprises (SMEs)
  8. Models and tools for evaluation of e-learning in higher vocational education
  9. Policy model and tool
  10. A management oriented approach to the evaluation of e-learning
  11. Individual learning model and tool

You can download the guide here: eval3

Please follow and like us:

6 Responses to “Evaluating e-Learning”

  1. Hiya… the link to the Guide to the Evaluation of e-Learning is requesting a WordPress login. Which I don’t have.

  2. Graham Attwell says:

    Think it is solved now – thanks Stephen

  3. zeinab says:

    Hi sir
    I am zeinab from iran, I am PHD student and research about evaluation e-learning models.could you help me? I need every models that evaluation Elearning in higher education,I read khan models,and search same models.
    thanks
    have a good time

Tweetbacks/Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] 对E-Learning的评价 这份e-learnind的评价指南共有45页,其中我真正喜欢的地方在于-作者在一开头就认识到人们视角上的差异会产生不同的评价标准。因此,这份指南的核心内容就是关于六种评价倾向的连续统一图(第21页,由Fitzpatrick及其他人提出),以及在考虑到(宏观,译者注)政策的前提下提出的评价体系(第27页)概要。Graham Attwell, ed., Pontydysgu November 27, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: Online Learning] [发表评论] […]

  2. […] Attwell has posted a report he wrote covering the evaluation of eLearning. It was a project that ran from 2002 – 2005. […]

  • Search Pontydysgu.org

    Social Media




    News Bites

    Racial bias in algorithms

    From the UK Open Data Institute’s Week in Data newsletter

    This week, Twitter apologised for racial bias within its image-cropping algorithm. The feature is designed to automatically crop images to highlight focal points – including faces. But, Twitter users discovered that, in practice, white faces were focused on, and black faces were cropped out. And, Twitter isn’t the only platform struggling with its algorithm – YouTube has also announced plans to bring back higher levels of human moderation for removing content, after its AI-centred approach resulted in over-censorship, with videos being removed at far higher rates than with human moderators.

    Please follow and like us:


    Gap between rich and poor university students widest for 12 years

    Via The Canary.

    The gap between poor students and their more affluent peers attending university has widened to its largest point for 12 years, according to data published by the Department for Education (DfE).

    Better-off pupils are significantly more likely to go to university than their more disadvantaged peers. And the gap between the two groups – 18.8 percentage points – is the widest it’s been since 2006/07.

    The latest statistics show that 26.3% of pupils eligible for FSMs went on to university in 2018/19, compared with 45.1% of those who did not receive free meals. Only 12.7% of white British males who were eligible for FSMs went to university by the age of 19. The progression rate has fallen slightly for the first time since 2011/12, according to the DfE analysis.

    Please follow and like us:


    Quality Training

    From Raconteur. A recent report by global learning consultancy Kineo examined the learning intentions of 8,000 employees across 13 different industries. It found a huge gap between the quality of training offered and the needs of employees. Of those surveyed, 85 per cent said they , with only 16 per cent of employees finding the learning programmes offered by their employers effective.

    Please follow and like us:


    News from 1994

    This is from a Tweet. In 1994 Stephen Heppell wrote in something called SCET” “Teachers are fundamental to this. They are professionals of considerable calibre. They are skilled at observing their students’ capability and progressing it. They are creative and imaginative but the curriculum must give them space and opportunity to explore the new potential for learning that technology offers.” Nothing changes!

    Please follow and like us:


    Other Pontydysgu Spaces

    • Pontydysgu on the Web

      pbwiki
      Our Wikispace for teaching and learning
      Sounds of the Bazaar Radio LIVE
      Join our Sounds of the Bazaar Facebook goup. Just click on the logo above.

      We will be at Online Educa Berlin 2015. See the info above. The stream URL to play in your application is Stream URL or go to our new stream webpage here SoB Stream Page.

      Please follow and like us:
  • Twitter

    RT @noamchomskyT "When economists insist that they too are scientists because they use mathematics, they are no different from astrologists protesting that they are just as scientific as astronomers because they also use computers and complicated charts." — Yanis Varoufakis

    About 2 days ago from Graham Attwell's Twitter via Twitter for iPad

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Meta

  • Categories